[Flexradio] RX2 Tests fail on EVERY band

[hartfuss]

What is so different with 1.16.1 compared to 1.17.0 ??
With 1.17.0 and SVN > 2497 there are no problems at all with firmware 
1.3.0.0.
I run all HTRX tests, RX (filter, level, image), TX (filter, image, 
carrier), RX2 (level, image), all bands passed in the first run!
73, Hans, DL2MDQ.


Neal Campbell schrieb:
> If the vendor specifies the steps for migration, it is the defined
> migration path for a successful upgrade. It might not make a lot of
> sense if you are not directly involved in the release (I think we all
> have sometimes scratched our heads on instructions from every vendor
> we deal with). If the steps are so onerous that it inflicts a lot of
> customer pain, then the vendor has made a mistake but I don't think
> thats the situation here.
> 
> The great news if that the previous software is so good that if the
> steps are onerous, people can stay with 1.14.1.
> 
> I had no issues (except the PA checksum one) when following their
> instructions but I might be lucky.
> 
> Neal Campbell
> Abroham Neal Software
> Programming Services for Windows, OS X and Linux
> (540) 242 0911
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Try Spot for OS X, the intelligent DXCluster Client at
> www.abrohamnealsoftware.com -  $15.99
> -------------------------------------------------
> For a great dog book, visit www.abrohamneal.com
> -------------------------------------------------
> See the FlexRadio Systems Flex-5000a in
> action at www.flex-videos.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Brian Lloyd <brian-wb6rqn at lloyd.com> wrote:
> 
>>On Dec 3, 2008, at 6:49 AM, Tim Ellison wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Excellent!  Yes, a "clean" or default database with no changes is
>>>absolutely necessary for the calibration procedures.
>>
>>That certainly sounds broken to me. Why doesn't the software keep a set of
>>default values for critical parameters needed for the built-in tests? How
>>hard would it be to force all the settings to what they need to be for the
>>test, and then restart the radio using its database when done?
>>
>>
>>>You can try running just the 40m image test a few times.  Sometimes a
>>>particular band within a test will fail on the first run, but will pass on a
>>>subsequent test.
>>
>>Not necessarily. I ran into that one last night. 10M kept failing the RX2
>>level test. Turns out it was a configuration issue which I finally figured
>>out but still, it seems to me that the software should be able to deal with
>>that internally.
>>
>>Brian Lloyd
>>Granite Bay Montessori School          9330 Sierra College Bl
>>brian AT gbmontessori DOT com          Roseville, CA 95661
>>+1.916.367.2131 (voice)                +1.791.912.8170 (fax)
>>
>>PGP key ID:          12095C52A32A1B6C
>>PGP key fingerprint: 3B1D BA11 4913 3254 B6E0  CC09 1209 5C52 A32A 1B6C
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
> FlexRadio at flex-radio.biz
> http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
> Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
> Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/  Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
> 
> .
>